Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard
| Bureaucrats' work area (archive) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Requests for bot flags request | watch To request a bot flag. |
Translation admin, interface admin request | watch To request to become a translation administrator or interface administrator. | ||
| Other resources: Need administrator assistance? See the administrators' noticeboard. Need help? Try the FAQ, or the Help desk! Have an idea or suggestion? Tell us at the Village pump! Need a checkuser? See the CU request page! | |||
| Click here to add a new section | |||
This is a place where users can communicate with bureaucrats, or bureaucrats with one another. Please refer to the links above for specific bureaucrat requests. Translate this header!
 |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
Closure request of Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Deadminship for User:Kallerna[edit]
The conversation has slowly been ongoing for about a month. If a formal de-adminship discussion is to be had at the appropriate venue, a bureaucrat closing the discussion at ANU seems to be warranted, particularly after Commons:Administrators/Requests/Kallerna (de-adminship) was closed quickly as not having attained the relevant consensus to open it. For these reasons, I am requesting that a bureaucrat close the discussion on the noticeboard. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- The procedure says a bureaucrat shall close a premature de-admin request as inadmissible if there is no prior discussion which led to some censensus for de-admin. This was the case in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Kallerna (de-adminship).
- Currently it appears obvious to me that there is some consensus for holding a deadmin discussion/vote. I think there is no rule that the de-admin vote shall be opened or the ANU discussion shall be closed by a bureaucrat. --Krd 09:21, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 17:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)